Who is entitled to design?

October 2nd, 2009

Ray and I got into a lively discussion tonight about the accessibility of design. We talked about the philosophy behind the Bauhaus. Was it elite? Was it socialist? For those disinclined to dig for ‘what the heck Bauhaus was about’, my take (and anyone is invited to disagree with me here) is that there was an overarching concept of universality in reaction to the industrial revolution that sought a return to more purity and simplicity, as well as things that were hand-crafted. However, at the time, I believe that the aesthetic as geared to a “trained” eye — someone who valued the “no frills” philosophy of the deutscher werkbund which created entire homes in this image — from walls to furniture. As altruistic as it was, it still offered something so different from the aesthetic of the time that I can imagine that it may have been seen as aseptic to the “common man”. I should mitigate my comment by saying that, clearly, it was a movement with legs as it has informed the enduring modernist movement, an aesthetic which I greatly admire.

I do feel more comfortable, though, in the presence of objects that have more humanistic intent. I said to Ray that I thought Phillipe Starke gave usable things personalities and stories. I like that concept and thought it was compelling. Ray aptly pointed out that, try as he might to make his chatckas  affordable, Phillipe Starke has been forced to worship at the alter of profit, just like everyone else. His creations are relegated to being described — and priced— as exclusive. Industrial designer Yves Behar of fuseproject believes in this storytelling and takes it further.His $100 laptop has gone further to make design more accessible. But then there’s the problem of giving laptops to kids who just need three squares or even a daily allotment of clean water.

So, does design need to be affordable to be accessible? Does making it affordable make it truly accessible? Is it only for the rich or the highly educated? Can altruism hide its products from profiteers? I think it all warrants some thought.

Casey Hrynkow, Partner
Herrainco Brand Strategy + Design Inc.

Bookmark and Share

Teach Children Creativity. Save the World. Design Thinking in Action.

October 1st, 2009

Bookmark and Share

Design Can Solve the World’s Problems

September 30th, 2009

Here’s a thought….

Our Invitation To You from IDEO on Vimeo.

living climate change

Bookmark and Share

Using Design Thinking

September 29th, 2009

I’d like to share a link to a Ted Talk by Tim Brown of IDEO. It beautifully illustrates what design has grown up to be, or is starting to grow up to be. Design thinking is transferable to problem solving in every realm and, in fact, is a way to break down old paradigms and think far more creatively. Design thinking is special, and it’s this thinking, not any lovely artifact or output produced by it, that makes design one of the most important professions of our time. In Tim Brown’s examples, “big” problems of hunger, thirst and poverty are illustrated. But shortcomings in our western world can also be solved by design thinking. When we think outside of artifacts — products, books, posters — and think about culture and understanding, we solve meaningful problems, produce less junk and make people’s lives richer if not better.

Casey Hrynkow, Partner
Herrainco Brand Strategy + Design Inc.

Bookmark and Share

Nice Nugget from Seth Godin’s Blog

September 25th, 2009

Cultural Wisdom

It’s very easy to underrate the value of cultural wisdom, otherwise known as sophistication.

Walk into a doctor’s office and the paneling is wrong, the carpeting is wrong and it feels dated. Instant lack of trust.

Meet a salesperson in your office. She doesn’t shake hands, she’s fumbling with an old Filofax, she mispronounces Steve Jobs’ name and doesn’t make eye contact.

Visit a website for a vendor and it looks like one of those long-letter opportunity seeker type sites.

In each case, the reason you wrote someone off had nothing to do with their product and everything to do with their lack of cultural wisdom.

We place a high value on sophistication, because we’ve been trained to seek it out as a cue for what lies ahead. We figure that if someone is too clueless to understand our norms, they probably don’t understand how to make us a product or service that we’ll like.

This is even more interesting because different cultures have different norms, so there isn’t one right answer. It’s an ever changing, complex task. Cultural wisdom is important precisely because it’s difficult.

And yet…

Who’s in charge of cultural norms at your organization? Does someone hire or train or review to make sure you and your people are getting it right? At Vogue magazine, of course, that’s all they do. If they lost it, even for a minute, they’d be toast.

It’s funny that we assume that all sorts of complex but ultimately unimportant elements need experts and committees and review, but the most important element of marketing–demonstrating cultural wisdom–shouldn’t even be discussed.

Bookmark and Share

Spec strikes again and Eric Karjaluoto of Vancouver’s SmashLAB Responds

August 11th, 2009

This is SO tiresome. People insist that designers should work for free when everyone else gets paid. Something to do with the misconception that design work is some sort of hobby. Eric Karjuloto has a wonderful response to a “contest” by author, Tim Ferriss,  here.

Bookmark and Share

Seth Godin’s Wisdom

July 23rd, 2009

From Seth Godin’s Blog, this is too good not to share.

Death spiral!

You’ve probably seen it. The fish monger sees a decline in business, so they have less money to spend on upkeep and inventory, so they keep the fish a bit longer and don’t clean up as often, so of course, business declines and then they have even less money… Eventually, you have an empty, smelly fish store that’s out of business.

The doctor has fewer patients so he doesn’t invest as much in training or staff and so some other patients choose to leave which means that there are even fewer patients…

The newspaper has fewer advertisers, so they can’t invest as much in running stories, so people stop reading it, which means advertisers have less reason to advertise which leaves less money for stories…

As Tom Peters says, “You can’t shrink your way to greatness,” and yet that’s what so many dying businesses try to do. They hunker down and wait for things to get better, but they don’t. This isn’t a dip, it’s a cul de sac. It’s over.

Right this minute, you still have some cash, some customers, some momentum… Instead of squandering it in a long, slow, death spiral, do something else. Buy a new platform. Move. Find new products for the customers that still trust you.

Change is a bear, but it’s better than death.

Bookmark and Share

The Designer as a Grain of Sand

July 17th, 2009

Much as many clients might think or hope, a designer’s role is not to take orders and be a servant to their ideas. Rather, it is to be like a grain of sand to an oyster, a mild irritant that has the potential to yield exquisite beauty and great value. I’m sure, this type of thinking would annoy many clients or out and out piss them off, but I got to this place by the simple act of sitting on our patio having dinner with my partner and wife. The cushion on my chair, by any stretch of the imagination just did not cushion. Now, I don’t know about you, but I always thought that the job of a cushion was to — duuuhhh cushion, — some poor soul’s bottom after a hard day’s work, whether he was downing a pint at the local pub or having dinner with his wife at a restaurant. And it got me to thinking. How could anyone design (”I have an idea”) and manufacture ( “how will it be built?”) a cushion that simply doesn’t cushion. And that led me to why a lengthy design education is necessary — if not mandatory in today’s marketplace.

I was mentoring a designer who, after working for several years, still seemed to get many of her ideas sabotaged. I explained that today, it’s common for designers to have three to six or more years of education and it’s not about learning software programs. It’s about being a grain of sand, asking questions, investigating and asking more questions because it’s the questions that supply the magic, or the answers hidden away, silently waiting to be discovered. Some people give up too early and some bright souls get there sooner that others, but in almost all cases, it was some sense of discovery that helped inform a solution. I’m always reminded of the joke “how many designers does it take to install a light bulb?” Answer: “Does it have to be a light bulb?”

It’s almost a forgone conclusion that designers entering a design program will already know how to use many of the basic software programs. Design thinking is not learning to use software, but how to examine, research and explore ideas — evaluate them, critique them, beat the hell of of them, discard the bad ones and refine the good ones. This takes two, three or more years to learn, and a lifetime to perfect. The designer as a grain of sand would have said, a cushion should cushion and if it doesn’t then what the hell is it?! Somewhere along the way, some designers give up, or maybe they are just too afraid of confrontation. Like many people, it’s just easier to do nothing or go with the flow, or not upset the apple cart. A lengthy education does (or should) attempt to help designers better articulate their ideas, building a sound argument for solutions. Ideas need to be nutured, but at some point defended, with reason and even science. Many designers get their work shredded simply because they lack the courage or the education with which to defend an idea. Experienced designers have to ability to make products or services incredibly rich, rewarding, and entertaining experiences that are legendary. And yet the idea and role is so misunderstood, which may explain why there aren’t more companies like Virgin, Apple, Audi, Disney or Nordstroms.

Like the lightbulb joke, a designer’s most valuable skill is when he or she acts like a grain of sand, questioning everything, and in the process has the ability to create a beautiful pearl of an idea that becomes a better computer, a better airline, a wholesome family adventure, an iconic retail experience or potentially a better cushion.

Ray Hrynkow, Partner + Creative Director
Herrainco Brand Strategy + Design Inc.

Bookmark and Share

Making Hay in a Hailstorm

June 1st, 2009

Unless you just fell out of the sky, you are well aware of the current global economic downturn. The cascade of bad news oozes forward like a giant snake of dominoes. It’s a media-fed vortex, sucking everything into it (emotionally if not literally). No one is unaffected and everyone is nervous. Very nervous. But there will be an end to this, and there will be better days ahead. Where will you be when that day comes — picking up the pieces or walking away with the prize?

Most people take cover and wait out a storm, opting for safety. They’ll make their hay while the sun in shining. A brave few see that, with everyone else under cover, there’s lots of room to get things done. Hell, you could even throw in another crop while you’re at it. I’ll call that making hay in a hailstorm.

How’d We Get Here?
Investment advisor, Peter Worsley of TD Waterhouse, calls our current predicament the “perfect storm” of economic bad news: with the collapse of the housing bubble; the collapse of commodities prices worldwide; the biggest selloff on the financial markets since the great depression; and the crisis in the banking system globally, demonstrated by the collapse of the investment banks in the US. Just about every other bank globally suffered from insufficient or low quality reserves plus toxic assets. This is one big financial “owie”.

Spending Versus Saving
Government-fueled economic stimuli can drive the economy to some degree, creating jobs and thus more consumer confidence. That confidence means that those consumers will feel more freedom to spend money. In the New York Times on February 1, writer David Segal said that, though consumer spending got us into this mess, it will also need to get us out out of it. Consumer spending accounts for 70% of the US economy, yet this has all but disappeared as home prices dropped and credit access tightened. There is a paradox at work here. Now that things are tight, we’re all hunkering down and preserving cash, which seems logical. But what the economy needs, more than anything, is for consumers to increase, not decrease, spending.

The new Canadian budget gives us a few hints about what consumers will be buying in the short term, at least. Home improvements, infrastructure as well as other investments in everything from education to improving access to financing for Canadians. That should translate into jobs, disposable income and money to borrow so that they can spend what they need to spend.

Feel the Fear and Do it Anyway
For your company to come out ahead in this recession, you’ll need to “feel the fear and do it anyway”. Those everyday consumers are a fundamental driver of our economy. They are still going to buy things. They’re just going to think differently about what they do buy. And while they’re doing that thinking, your company needs to show up.

Canadian businesses stand to benefit from this loosening of the federal purse strings which, it is posited, will loosen those of consumers. The challenge for Canadian businesses is to ensure that they’re not shuttered up against a storm when consumers are looking for places to spend money. Brand communication needs to continue, albeit with a different tone than that of the last decade.

People will be spending more on what is necessary and on what makes sense rather than on the kinds of luxury items. But consumers still need  personal treats to get them through the gloom. Just like the recessions of the 1930s, 70s and 90s, it is expected that the motion picture and alcohol industries will do well. Anything from a latte to a bottle of wine and, if my take on guys is right, a 65″ TV (with full HD 1080p resolution, enhanced black level and new ultra-thin design, Mega Dynamic Contrast Ratio in excess of 1,000,000:1…) …but I digress. My point is that people will still want “stuff‚” and they’ll buy what they trust, what they know and what they see as necessary, either physically or emotionally. They’ll also buy beauty and style — every time.

Paying it Forward
But there is another factor driving consumer decision-makin these days, and it’s “doing good”. The statistics are inescapable.

The most recent Edelman Good Purpose Global Study says that 70% of Canadians would remain loyal to a brand in a recession if it supports a good cause ‚ even if it isn’t the cheapest brand available. I smell opportunity. Are you doing anything to make a difference in your community or in the world at large? And don’t even think about green washing. Be innovative, find a cause you believe in and get behind it. Make it an intrinsic part of your brand. Pay it forward.

Build Value and Trust
Where we once talked more openly about the ”emotional attributes” of a product or service, consumers will be mindful of the value that they are purchasing rather than only the succor of self-gratification. That value usually doesn’t translate to the lowest price. What they buy may feel like a more “necessary”, carefully considered and long-lasting purchase. Or it may be a product from a company who treats their customers better — who’s products are more innovative or beautiful — that makes that purchase a more compelling idea.

This recession may be the return of the “trusted” brand rather than the “brand of the moment”. Trust is a pivotal issue in the world today. There is less and less that we feel we can trust. We encourage building trust in your products and services. We also argue for rewarding that trust by delivering on promises. That will put your company out ahead of the pack as the economy returns to health. It means choosing a genuinely inspiring message and getting it out there. Use good writing and good design. Don’t be afraid to use humour. But don’t turtle, not now.

Making Hay - Coming Out Ahead
According to Terry O’Reilly, on his CBC Radio program, The Age of Persuasion, even though Toyota’s gas efficient cars were selling as fast as they could make them, in 1973 when the recession hit, the company kept up their advertising and marketing when, rationally, they could have coasted. But by 1976 when the clouds parted, they had surpassed both Honda and Volkswagen. They maintained their top-of-mind positioning and sling-shotted past their competition.

O’Reilly also cited advertising icon David Ogilvy, who studied advertising during that same recession and found that those who maintained their advertising during that time also maintained their mindshare. They did much better than those who cut their spending, especially in the years following the recession.

Be Seen
In branding, and brand communications, we are recommending refocussing on your core strengths and selling what you do well, with a fresh approach that emphasizes the benefits to the consumer. We also recommend finding a way to pay things forward, even if it seems a bit counter-intuitive right now. You need to be seen. Make sure that your branding and packaging are exceptional. Others will be afraid to take these steps, so you’ll have more space to move around and to command market share. Think about what you can do to speak to the consumers you need to keep you moving. Do it for your company — heck, do it for Canada!

Bookmark and Share

The Vendor-Client Relationship

May 27th, 2009

I can’t resist posting this. It’s not just us…every design firm has this issue. It appears to be unique to our business. No other profession seems to have to deal with people who feel that this is legitimate way to do business. The Vendor-Client Relationship.

Bookmark and Share